4.8 Article

Astrocyte-derived lipoxins A4 and B4 promote neuroprotection from acute and chronic injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 127, 期 12, 页码 4403-4414

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI77398

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP123448]
  2. NIH [EY026082]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [NSERC 06561]
  4. Glaucoma Research Society of Canada (GRSC)
  5. Glaucoma Research Foundation Shaffer Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocytes perform critical non-cell autonomous roles following CNS injury that involve either neurotoxic or neuroprotective effects. Yet the nature of potential prosurvival cues has remained unclear. In the current study, we utilized the close interaction between astrocytes and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the eye to characterize a secreted neuroprotective signal present in retinal astrocyte conditioned medium (ACM). Rather than a conventional peptide neurotrophic factor, we identified a prominent lipid component of the neuroprotective signal through metabolomics screening. The lipoxins LXA(4) and LXB4 are small lipid mediators that act locally to dampen inflammation, but they have not been linked directly to neuronal actions. Here, we determined that LXA(4) and LXB4 are synthesized in the inner retina, but their levels are reduced following injury. Injection of either lipoxin was sufficient for neuroprotection following acute injury, while inhibition of key lipoxin pathway components exacerbated injury-induced damage. Although LXA(4) signaling has been extensively investigated, LXB4, the less studied lipoxin, emerged to be more potent in protection. Moreover, LXB4 neuroprotection was different from that of established LXA(4) signaling, and therapeutic LXB4 treatment was efficacious in a chronic model of the common neurodegenerative disease glaucoma. Together, these results identify a potential paracrine mechanism that coordinates neuronal homeostasis and inflammation in the CNS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据