4.8 Article

Prolonged human neural stem cell maturation supports recovery in injured rodent CNS

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 127, 期 9, 页码 3293-3305

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI92955

关键词

-

资金

  1. Veterans Administration Gordon Mansfield Collaborative Consortium for Spinal Cord Injury Research [1I50RX001706-01]
  2. Veterans Adminstration Merit Review grants [1 I01 BX001252-01A2, 1 I21 RX00084-01A1]
  3. NIH [NS09881, EB014986]
  4. Craig H. Neilsen Foundation
  5. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
  6. Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  7. Bernard and Anne Spitzer Charitable Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neural stem cells (NSCs) differentiate into both neurons and glia, and strategies using human NSCs have the potential to restore function following spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the time period of maturation for human NSCs in adult injured CNS is not well defined, posing fundamental questions about the design and implementation of NSC-based therapies. This work assessed human H9 NSCs that were implanted into sites of SCI in immunodeficient rats over a period of 1.5 years. Notably, grafts showed evidence of continued maturation over the entire assessment period. Markers of neuronal maturity were first expressed 3 months after grafting. However, neurogenesis, neuronal pruning, and neuronal enlargement continued over the next year, while total graft size remained stable over time. Axons emerged early from grafts in very high numbers, and half of these projections persisted by 1.5 years. Mature astrocyte markers first appeared after 6 months, while more mature oligodendrocyte markers were not present until 1 year after grafting. Astrocytes slowly migrated from grafts. Notably, functional recovery began more than 1 year after grafting. Thus, human NSCs retain an intrinsic human rate of maturation, despite implantation into the injured rodent spinal cord, yet they support delayed functional recovery, a finding of great importance in planning human clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据