4.6 Article

A graphene oxide-molecular Cu porphyrin-integrated BiVO4 photoanode for improved photoelectrochemical water oxidation performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 4062-4072

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta13452b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773096, 21572084]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2018-k08]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu [17JR5RA186]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monoclinic bismuth vanadate (BiVO4), as a rising star in light-catching materials, has been researched in many fields, such as photoelectrochemical water splitting. To date, it is still noteworthy that the photogenerated electron-hole fast recombination and the slow kinetic rate impede the photoelectrochemical performance of BiVO4. Herein, a composite material of graphene oxide (GO) and molecular Cu porphyrin (CuTCPP)-modified BiVO4-based photoanode was prepared and characterized by various relevant physical tests. The photoelectrochemical performance measurements show that the assembled CuTCPP/GO/BiVO4 photoanode has an admirable photocurrent density value, which is far better than that of pristine BiVO4. Under AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm(-2) Xe lamp, the photocurrent density of the CuTCPP/GO/BiVO4 photoanode reached 5.0 mA cm(-2), which was 4-fold enhancement than that of pristine BiVO4. In addition, the optimized CuTCPP/GO/BiVO4 photoanode displays an evident negative shift of the onset potential of around 400 mV, and it presents a fascinating charge injection efficiency of 92%. The fine photoelectrochemical performance is due to more active sites provided by the molecular catalyst CuTCPP and excellent electrical conductivity and fast charge separation rate offered by GO. Furthermore, GO and CuTCPP form strong conjugate systems, which effectively inhibit the photogenerated electron-hole recombination. These results offer a new concept of assembling a composite photoanode for efficient energy devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据