4.7 Review

Methods for Management of Soilborne Diseases in Crop Production

期刊

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10010016

关键词

crop production; integrated soilborne disease management; soilborne pathogens

类别

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Evans-Allen grant [TENX-1926-CCOCP, TENX-S-1083]
  2. NIFA, USDA, Southern Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program [OS18-112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The significant problems caused by soilborne pathogens in crop production worldwide include reduced crop performance, decreased yield, and higher production costs. In many parts of the world, methyl bromide was extensively used to control these pathogens before the implementation of the Montreal Protocol-a global agreement to protect the ozone layer. The threats of soilborne disease epidemics in crop production, high cost of chemical fungicides and development of fungicide resistance, climate change, new disease outbreaks and increasing concerns regarding environmental as well as soil health are becoming increasingly evident. These necessitate the use of integrated soilborne disease management strategies for crop production. This article summarizes methods for management of soilborne diseases in crop production which includes the use of sanitation, legal methods, resistant cultivars/varieties and grafting, cropping system, soil solarization, biofumigants, soil amendments, anaerobic soil disinfestation, soil steam sterilization, soil fertility and plant nutrients, soilless culture, chemical control and biological control in a system-based approach. Different methods with their strengths and weaknesses, mode of action and interactions are discussed, concluding with a brief outline of future directions which might lead to the integration of described methods in a system-based approach for more effective management of soilborne diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据