4.7 Article

Selective Preparation of 1T-and 2H-Phase MoS2 Nanosheets with Abundant Monolayer Structure and Their Applications in Energy Storage Devices

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 998-1009

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b02043

关键词

1T phase MoS2; lithium-ion intercalation method; abundant monolayer structure; supercapacitor; lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NE2019103]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51672071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 1T-phase MoS2 has gained widespread attention because of its superhigh electronic conductivity. However, the comparatively complicated preparation and low-yielding production may hinder its potential applications in the energy storage field; hence, we developed a facile process to selectively prepare 1T- and 2H-phase MoS2 nanosheets with abundant monolayer structure with a large scale by controlling annealing temperature. With the further liquid phase exfoliation and freeze-drying procedure, the proposed nanosheets could maintain monolayer structure in the powder phase, and the existence of monolayers is believed to improve the electrochemical performance. The electrochemical performances of both the supercapacitor and lithium-ion batteries indicate that those prepared 1T-phase MoS2 nanosheets with abundant monolayer structure exhibit superior cycling stability. Specifically, the proposed 1T-phase MoS2 nanosheets could remain 170.4 F g(-1) at 10 A g(-1), and a capacity retention of 91% is achieved after 5000 cycles at 1 A g(-1) in the symmetrical supercapacitor. It also delivers the excellent stability property of lithium ion insertion and extraction, which still maintain a charge capacity of 598 mAh g(-1) after 1000 cycles at 1 A g(-1) in the evaluation of lithium-ion batteries. The mechanism suggested that the high conductivity and unique electronic structure of 1T-phase MoS2 nanosheets may contribute to the enhancement of electrochemical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据