4.7 Article

Discarding the disc in a changing-state AGN: the UV/X-ray relation in NGC 4151

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3196

关键词

accretion, accretion discs; black hole physics; galaxies: active; galaxies: individual: NGC 4151

资金

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/N50404X/1, ST/P000541/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent monitoring campaigns designed to map the accretion regime in active galactic nuclei (AGN) show major discrepancies with models where the optical/ultraviolet (UV) is produced by X-ray-illuminated, optically thick disc material within a few hundred gravitational radii. However, these campaigns only monitored X-rays below 10 keV, whereas the bolometric luminosity for most of these AGN peaks above 50 keV. We use data from the recent multiwavelength campaign by Edelson et al. on NGC 4151 - the only AGN bright enough to be monitored at higher energies with Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT). We develop a spectral-timing model with a hot corona, warm Comptonization, and outer standard disc. This fits the time-averaged spectrum well, but completely fails to match the UV variability predicted from the X-ray light curve. However, it reveals that NGC 4151 had a bolometric luminosity around 1.4 per cent of the Eddington luminosity during this campaign, close to the luminosity at which AGN show a 'changing-state' transition, where the broad optical lines disappear. Stellar mass black holes show a state transition at a similarly low Eddington fraction, which is broadly interpreted as the inner disc being replaced by an optically thin flow. We find that the UV light curve can instead be matched by reprocessing of the X-ray flux on size scales of the broad-line region (BLR; 1.5-20 light-days) and rule out there being optically thick material inwards of this, as expected if the thin disc is replaced by the flow below the inner radius of the BLR. These results emphasize the need for even longer time-scale, multiwavelength monitoring campaigns on variable AGN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据