4.7 Article

Changes of Circulating MicroRNAs in Response to Treatment With Teriparatide or Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 103, 期 3, 页码 1206-1213

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-02406

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Expression of microRNAs (miRs) related to bone metabolism in the serum may be affected by antiosteoporotic treatment. Objective: To investigate the effect of two antiosteoporotic agents with opposite effects on bone metabolism on miR expression profile in the serum. Design: Observational, open label, nonrandomized clinical trial. Setting: The outpatient clinics for Metabolic Bone Diseases of 424 General Military Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece. Patients and Interventions: Postmenopausal women with low bone mass were treated with either teriparatide (TPTD; n = 30) or denosumab (n = 30) for 12 months. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in the serum expression of selected miRs linked to bone metabolism at 3 and 12 months of treatment. Secondary measurements: associations of measured miRs with changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at 12 months and the bone turnover markers (BTMs) C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide at 3 and 12 months. Results: We found significantly decreased relative expression of miR-33-3p at 3 months (P = 0.03) and of miR-133a at 12 months (P = 0.042) of TPTD treatment. BMD values at 12 months of TPTD treatment were significantly and inversely correlated with miR-124-3p expression at 3 months (P = 0.008). Relative expression of miR-24-3p and miR-27a was correlated with changes in BTMs during TPTD treatment and of miR-21-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-27a, miR-222-5p, and miR-335-5p with changes in BTMs during denosumab treatment. Conclusions: Circulating miRs are differentially affected by treatment with TPTD and denosumab. TPTD affects the relative expression of miRs related to the expression of RUNX-2 (miR-33) and DKK-1 gene (miR-133).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据