4.6 Article

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for postoperative pain control after lumbar spine surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 84-89

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.08.030

关键词

Anti-inflammatory drugs; Postoperative pain control; Lumbar spine surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study objective: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) play a role in pain relief, especially in postoperative pain caused by inflammation. They have demonstrated significant opioid dose-sparing effects, which help in reducing postoperative effects and opioid side effects. The objective of this meta-analysis was to explore the role of NSAIDs in reducing postoperative pain at different time intervals and provide reference for medication after lumbar spine surgery by a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT). Design: A meta-analysis study of randomized controlled trials. Setting: Postoperative recovery area. Patients: Adult patients who have undergone lumbar spine surgery. Intervention: Patients received NSAIDs for pain control after lumbar spine surgery. Measurements: Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI were used to evaluate the visual analog scale of postoperative pain. Main results: Four hundred and eight participants from eight studies were included in this study. The difference between the NSAIDs group and placebo is significant in 0-6, 12, and 24 h groups (overall: SMD = -0.72, 95%CI -0.98 to -0.45; 0-6 h: SMD = 0.50, 95%CI - 0.81 to -0.19;12 h: SMD = -1.07, 95%CI - 1.45 to -0.70; 24 h: SMD = -1.16, 95%CI - 1.87 to -0.45). Heterogeneity and publication bias were observed in the 0-6 and 24 h groups. Conclusion: NSAIDs are effective in postoperative analgesia after lumbar spine surgery. The study type, NSAID dose, different surgery types, and analgesic type might influence the efficacy of NSAIDs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据