4.3 Article

Go See Somebody: How Spouses Promote Mental Health Care

期刊

SOCIETY AND MENTAL HEALTH
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 80-96

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2156869319834335

关键词

depressive symptoms; families; help-seeking; mental health care

资金

  1. Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health [R03HD078754]
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R03HD078754]
  3. Ohio State University Institute for Population Research through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health [P2CHD058484]
  4. National Institute on Aging at the National Institutes of Health [R21AG044585]
  5. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  6. Population Research Center at The University of Texas at Austin through Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P2CHD042849]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study considers when, whether, and how spouses encourage professional mental health care by analyzing qualitative data from 90 in-depth interviews with gay, lesbian, and heterosexual spouses. Findings show that a majority of spouses are engaged in promoting each other's mental health care but that the strategies used to promote care vary by gender and the gender composition of the couple. The majority of gay men and lesbian women promote care by framing mental health problems as largely biochemical, fixable only with professional care or medicine, and work to destigmatize this care. Lesbian women uniquely emphasize the influence of a spouse's symptoms on marital quality as a reason to pursue care. Some heterosexual women and men also report seeing their spouse's mental health care as something for them to deal with on their own and thus do not encourage care. This study has important implications for researchers looking to understand why some individuals seek mental health care and others do not and provides policymakers insight into mental health interventions via spouses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据