4.7 Article

Relationship between the Asian Westerly Jet Stream and Summer Rainfall over Central Asia and North China: Roles of the Indian Monsoon and the South Asian High

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 537-552

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0814.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research Program of China [2014CB953900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41221064, 91637208]
  3. Basic Scientific Research and Operation Foundation of the CAMS [2015Z001]
  4. Special Fund for Tibetan Plateau research [GYHY201406001]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592564]
  6. Zhuhai Joint Innovative Center for Climate, Environment and Ecosystem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diagnostic analyses are performed to investigate the relationship between the upper-level Asian westerly jet stream (AWJS) and the associated rainfall pattern over the AWJS region in boreal summer on interannual time scales. Results show an out-of-phase rainfall variation over central Asia (CA) and north China (NC), which is closely related to the southeast-northwest (SE-NW) shift of the AWJS. The physical mechanisms on the relationship between the AWJS and the rainfall pattern are revealed by exploring the effects of the Indian summer monsoon (ISM) and the South Asian high (SAH). It is found that the SE-NW shifts of the AWJS and SAH associated with the ISM lead to the anomalous circulations over the midlatitudes in the AWJS region and cause rainfall anomalies over CA and NC. A weak ISM results in a southeastward shift of SAH, which is responsible for a southeastward shift of the AWJS. The anomalous atmospheric circulation associated with the southeastward located SAH produces anomalous updrafts (downdrafts) over the western (eastern) AWJS region, resulting in increased rainfall over CA and decreased rainfall over NC. It is proposed that the upper-level system SAH plays a crucial role in the teleconnection among the summer rainfall over the midlatitude AWJS region and ISM region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据