4.6 Article

Examining exposure reciprocity in a resin based composite using high irradiance levels and real-time degree of conversion values

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 583-593

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.010

关键词

Mid FTIR; Degree of conversion; Polymerization kinetics; Irradiance; Flowable composite; Radiant exposure; Exposure reciprocity; Dental curing light

资金

  1. Federal Republic of Germany, Ministry of Education and Research [17081X10]
  2. Operational Program Research and Development for Innovations
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  4. national budget of Czech Republic, within the framework of project Centre of Polymer Systems [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0111]
  5. Dalhousie University, Faculty of Dentistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Exposure reciprocity suggests that, as long as the same radiant exposure is delivered, different combinations of irradiance and exposure time will achieve the same degree of resin polymerization. This study examined the validity of exposure reciprocity using real time degree of conversion results from one commercial flowable dental resin. Additionally a new fitting function to describe the polymerization kinetics is proposed. Methods. A Plasma Arc Light Curing Unit (LCU) was used to deliver 0.75, 1.2, 1.5, 3.7 or 7.5 W/cm(2) to 2 mm thick samples of Tetric EvoFlow (Ivoclar Vivadent). The irradiances and radiant exposures received by the resin were determined using an integrating sphere connected to a fiber-optic spectrometer. The degree of conversion (DC) was recorded at a rate of 8.5 measurements a second at the bottom of the resin using attenuated total reflectance Fourier Transform mid-infrared spectroscopy (FT-MIR). Five specimens were exposed at each irradiance level. The DC reached after 170s and after 5, 10 and 15 J/cm(2) had been delivered was compared using analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD post hoc multiple comparison tests (alpha = 0.05). Results. The same DC values were not reached after the same radiant exposures of 5, 10 and 15 J/cm(2) had been delivered at an irradiance of 3.7 and 7.5 W/cm(2). Thus exposure reciprocity was not supported for Tetric EvoFlow (p < 0.05). Signcance. For Tetric EvoFlow, there was no significant difference in the DC when 5, 10 and 15 J/cm(2) were delivered at irradiance levels of 0.75, 1.2 and 1.5 W/cm(2). The optimum combination of irradiance and exposure time for this commercial dental resin may be close to 1.5 W/cm(2) for 12s. (C) 2015 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据