4.7 Article

Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and financial performance: The moderating effect of the institutional environment in two transition economies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 26-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.192

关键词

Corporate social responsibility; Customer satisfaction; Institutional environments; Transition economies

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71472118, 71573185]
  2. Shanghai Planning Fund of Philosophy and Social Sciences [2014BGL011]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
  4. Shanghai Education Development Foundation [13SG41]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a long-established topic in firms' operating process, yet few studies have examined CSR from the perspective of customer satisfaction and institutional environments. We fill the gap in the existing literature by exploring the roles of customer satisfaction and institutional environments as they pertain to the link between CSR efforts and financial performance, specifically in the context of transitional economies. In this work, we use a sample of 238 firms located in China and Vietnam. Our empirical results present several interesting findings: (a) the relationship between CSR efforts and financial performance is fully mediated by customer satisfaction; (b) good institutional environments positively strengthen the impact of CSR efforts on firms' customer satisfaction; and (c) there are significant differences in the moderating effect of institutional environments between the two countries that were sampled in this research. In the Chinese sample, the institutional environment positively moderated the relationthip between CSR and customer satisfaction; while in the Vietnamese sample, the institutional environment positively moderated the relationship between CSR efforts and the return on sales (ROS). Based on these findings, we provide several recommendations for managers to effectively conduct CSR practices. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据