4.7 Article

Swine effluent post-treatment by alkaline control and UV radiation combined for water reuse

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 1247-1254

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.033

关键词

Effluent disinfection; UV radiation; Alkaline control; Water reuse; Swine effluent

资金

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personal (Capes)
  2. Brazilian Ministry of Education, PNPD [02967/09-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water reuse is widely practiced by industries, including swine farms, to reduce the consumption of clean water. However, water reuse requires controlling physical and chemical parameters of quality and mainly pathogens to meet the regulation limits recommended for no potable reuse. This paper presents an exploratory evaluation of the combined disinfection use of alkaline control and ultraviolet radiation to suit the sanitary parameter of secondary effluent from a swine manure treatment plant for agricultural water reuse. The efficiency of disinfection was measured by total coliforms, Escherichia coil and Salmonella at three pH levels (7.5, 9 and 10), two settling times (30 and 60 min), and two contact times for ultraviolet radiation (0 and 60 s) at 160.5 +/- 20.8 mJ/cm(2). The highest inactivation responses were 3.7 log for total coliforms, 3.8 log for Escherichia coli and 4.0 log for Salmonella at pH 10, 60 min of settling and 60 s of exposure to UV radiation. These results show an increase in the disinfection efficiency of 2.8 log for total coliforms and Escherichia coli and 2.4 log for Salmonella in comparison to pH control alone. Therefore, a previous alkaline treatment forces the sedimentation of the total suspended solids, responsible for reducing the ultraviolet light germicidal effect, and, for this reason, in the next stage of disinfection the efficiency was higher. The application of both disinfection agents sequentially yielded better results to improve biosecurity status for water reuse. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据