4.1 Article

Systematic optimization of square-wave electroporation conditions for bovine primary fibroblasts

期刊

BMC MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12860-020-00254-5

关键词

Fibroblasts; Electroporation; Transfection efficiency; Square wave pulse

资金

  1. Netaji Subhas International Fellowship of the Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR) [18(2)/2016-EQR/Edn]
  2. Alexander-von-Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Gene transfer by electroporation is an established method for the non-viral mediated transfection of mammalian cells. Primary cells pose a particular challenge for electroporation-mediated gene transfer, since they are more vulnerable than immortalized cells, and have a limited proliferative capacity. Improving the gene transfer by using square wave electroporation in difficult to transfect cells, like bovine fetal fibroblasts, is a prerequisite for transgenic and further downstream experiments. Results Here, bovine fetal fibroblasts were used for square-wave electroporation experiments in which the following parameters were systematically tested: electroporation buffer, electroporation temperature, pulse voltage, pulse duration, pulse number, cuvette type and plasmid DNA amount. For the experiments a commercially available square-wave generator was applied. Post electroporation, the bovine fetal fibroblasts were observed after 24 h for viability and reporter expression. The best results were obtained with a single 10 millisecond square-wave pulse of 400 V using 10 mu g supercoiled plasmid DNA and 0.3 x 10(6) cells in 100 mu l of Opti-MEM medium in 4 mm cuvettes. Importantly, the electroporation at room temperature was considerably better than with pre-cooled conditions. Conclusions The optimized electroporation conditions will be relevant for gene transfer experiments in bovine fetal fibroblasts to obtain genetically engineered donor cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer and for reprogramming experiments in this species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据