4.7 Article

Perpendicular alignment of lymphatic endothelial cells in response to spatial gradients in wall shear stress

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0732-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542152]
  2. American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship [16PRE27500024]
  3. Alexander S. Onassis Foundation Graduate Scholarship
  4. A.G. Leventis Foundation Graduate Scholarship
  5. Gerondelis Foundation, Inc. Scholarship
  6. National Institutes of Health [R01HL128779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using microfluidic systems, Michalaki et al show that lymphatic endothelial cells exposed to wall shear stress orient in the direction perpendicular to flow and show increased nuclear FOXC2 levels in a manner dependent on E-selectin, a transmembrane adhesion protein. These data provide insights into how lymphatic vessels respond to local flow-mediated mechanical cues. One-way valves in the lymphatic system form from lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) during embryonic development and are required for efficient tissue drainage. Although fluid flow is thought to guide both valve formation and maintenance, how this occurs at a mechanistic level remains incompletely understood. We built microfluidic devices that reproduce critical aspects of the fluid flow patterns found at sites of valvulogenesis. Using these devices, we observed that LECs replicated aspects of the early steps in valvulogenesis: cells oriented perpendicular to flow in the region of maximum wall shear stress (WSS) and exhibited enhanced nuclear localization of FOXC2, a transcription factor required for valvulogenesis. Further experiments revealed that the cell surface protein E-selectin was required for both of these responses. Our observations suggest that spatial gradients in WSS help to demarcate the locations of valve formation, and implicate E-selectin as a component of a mechanosensory process for detecting WSS gradients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据