4.7 Article

Preparation of chemically activated carbon from waste biomass by single-stage and two-stage pyrolysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 643-653

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.061

关键词

Corn stalk; Activated carbon; Pyrolysis; Texture properties; Cadmium sorption

资金

  1. Science and Scientific Grant Agency VEGA [2/0158/15, 2/0114/13]
  2. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-0252-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agricultural waste biomass is often used to produce activated carbon with high specific surface area, high degree of porosity and excellent sorption properties. Many researchers used chemical activation in connection with single-stage or two-stage pyrolysis. Therefore, the aim of this work was to compare both methods. The first method covered direct chemical activation of biomass with a single pyrolytic step. The second procedure consisted of two-stage pyrolysis (after first pyrolysis the char was chemically activated and pyrolysed secondly). Significant differences in morphology, textural properties, organic structure and crystallinity of prepared activated carbons were observed. Activated carbons were tested as a sorbent of Cd2+ from water. Textural analysis showed that the volume of micropores in sample after two-stage pyrolysis was more than four times higher in comparison with single-stage. The value of external surface area related with presence of mesopores was similar for both activated carbons (S-ext(single-stage) = 48.1 m(2)/g; S-ext(two-stage) = 50.3 m(2)/g). The study of ACs sorption capacity was performed as exemplified by cadmium. The experiments evaluated using Langmuir and Freundlich models showed that AC prepared by two-stage pyrolysis has more than three times higher sorption capacity, i.e. 107.5 mg Cd/g comparing to single-stage one, where the sorption capacity of 32.8 mg Cd/g was attained. Thus, loading of environment by cadmium and its uptake by various sorbents are also discussed and compared. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据