4.7 Article

Developing and testing a tool for sustainability assessment in an early process design phase - Case study of formic acid production by conventional and carbon dioxide-based routes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 1636-1651

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.145

关键词

Sustainability assessment; Sustainability indicators; Green Chemistry; The Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and Classification labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP); Formic acid; Chemical process design

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (DSTGOI)
  2. Academy of Finland
  3. Academy of Finland [129173, 140122]
  4. Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation, Tekes [40313/09]
  5. DST
  6. R.T. Mody Distinguished Professor Endowment
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [140122, 140122, 129173, 129173] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper suggests a 'Sustainability Assessment Tool' that can be used in early design phases of production processes. Green Chemistry principles were considered as a baseline when proposing the sustainability indicators. European chemicals regulations and databases were also applied and used as a baseline in chemicals hazards assessment. The tool is an excel based checklist, with multiple choice answers that are scored based on their severity of impact. This Sustainability Assessment Tool was tested by comparing two formic acid production routes. It is proposed that using the tool as a guideline in the early stages of a chemical process design can provide competitive advantages in research as it provides guidance on the critical target areas of the process that should be further developed. This can further guide researchers and engineers through the piloting and manufacturing stages. In addition it is also expected that the suggested sustainability assessment tool can be used as an educating purpose to foster sustainability in process design work during all the design stages. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据