4.7 Article

Energetic and exergetic analysis of solar-powered lithium bromide-water absorption cooling system

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 60-73

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.060

关键词

Absorption cooling; Solar collector; Coefficient of performance; Exergetic efficiency; Exergy destruction; Fuel depletion ratio; Improvement potential

资金

  1. Scientific Research at King Saud University through the Research Group Project [RG-1435-078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a comprehensive thermodynamic modeling of the solar-powered lithium bromide-water (LiBr-H2O) absorption chiller system. The study examined the influence of the solar collector types on the collector efficiency and the useful heat gain by the collector for the best performance. The study also analyzed the effects of generator inlet temperature, effectiveness of the solution heat exchanger and the pump mass flow rate on the energetic and exergetic performance of the chiller system. The examined performance parameters were coefficient of performance, exergetic efficiency, exergy destruction, fuel depletion ratio and improvement potential. The study revealed that 'evacuated selective surface' collector type has resulted in higher efficiency and more useful heat gain than the single and double glazed collector types. Additionally, the increase in the heat exchanger effectiveness improved the system performance, while the increase in the pump mass flow rate reduced the chiller performance. Furthermore, the result also indicated that the main source of the exergy destruction is the solar collector. In the solar collector, 71.9% of the input exergy was destroyed which accounted for 84% of the total exergy loss. Additionally, 7.1% of the inlet exergy was lost in the generator which was equivalent to 8.3% of the total exergy loss. The overall exergetic improvement potential of the system was approximately 84.7%. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据