4.7 Article

Comparative life cycle assessment of sulfoaluminate clinker production derived from industrial solid wastes and conventional raw materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 1314-1324

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.184

关键词

Industrial solid waste; Life-cycle analysis; Sulfoaluminate clinker; Resource consumption; Global warming

资金

  1. Shandong Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [JQ201514]
  2. Primary Research & Development Plan of Shandong Province [2016GSF116006]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0703100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An environmental impact assessment was obtained for sulfoaluminate clinker preparation from red mud, desulfurization gypsum, and other industrial solid wastes, and the results were compared with a standard production method. A quantitative analysis and prediction of the environmental burden that results from mining/waste utilization, energy consumption, and waste emissions in sulfoaluminate clinker preparations using limestone, gypsum, bauxite and using industrial solid wastes as raw materials was provided. The life cycle theory was used to analyze the different production technologies, and it was found that comprehensive waste utilization to produce sulfoaluminate clinker reduces resource consumption, global warming, chemical oxygen demand, particulate matter, primary energy consumption, acidification, eutrophication, and solid waste generation by 92.89%, 40.95%, 36.48%, 25.25%, 12.6%, 8.3%, 7.91%, and 5.29%, respectively, compared with the conventional preparation of sulfoaluminate clinker. The sulfoaluminate clinker production with comprehensive waste utilization can reduce the total environmental burden by 38.62% compared with the conventional process. Cement manufacturing enterprises should combine power plants and chemical plants for industrial solid waste collection and recycling. Such a production mode would promote a circular economy industry, reduce the consumption of primary energy and natural resources, and reduce global warming. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据