4.5 Article

MHD Boundary Layer Flow of a Power-Law Nanofluid Containing Gyrotactic Microorganisms Over an Exponentially Stretching Surface

期刊

CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 525-549

出版社

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2020.08576

关键词

Bioconvection; gyrotactic microorganisms; magnetohydrodynamic; nanofluid; boundary layer; power-law

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University
  2. Big Group Research Project [R.G.P2/16/40]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focusses on the numerical investigations of boundary layer flow for magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) and a power-law nanofluid containing gyrotactic microorganisms on an exponentially stretching surface with zero nanoparticle mass flux and convective heating. The nonlinear system of the governing equations is transformed and solved by Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method. The impacts of the transverse magnetic field, bioconvection parameters, Lewis number, nanofluid parameters, Prandtl number and power-law index on the velocity, temperature, nanoparticle volume fraction, density of motile microorganism profiles is explored. In addition, the impacts of these parameters on local skin-friction coefficient, local Nusselt, local Sherwood numbers and local density number of the motile microorganisms are discussed. The results reveal that the power law index is considered an important factor in this study. Due to neglecting the buoyancy force term, the bioconvection and nanofluid parameters have slight effects on the velocity profiles. The resultant Lorentz force, from increasing the magnetic field parameter, try to decrease the velocity profiles and increase the rescaled density of motile microorganisms, temperature and nanoparticle volume fraction profiles. Physically, an augmentation of power-law index drops the reduced local skin-friction and reduced Sherwood number, while it increases reduced Nusselt number and reduced local density number of motile microorganisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据