4.7 Article

Agricultural pollution and regulation: How to subsidize agriculture?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 258-264

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.216

关键词

Agricultural pollution; Agricultural subsidy; Pollution tax; Food safety

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China [71401057, 71271100]
  2. Foundation for High-level Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong, GDUPS
  3. Guangdong Social Science Foundation [GD13YLJ02]
  4. Soft Science Project of Guangdong Province [2014A070704008]
  5. Key National Social Science Fund of PRC [14AJY020]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71633002, 71333004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agricultural pollution is extremely serious in China, and agricultural output quantity subsidy makes it even worse. This paper captures the impacts of agricultural subsidy, including quantity subsidy and innovation subsidy, on agricultural pollution. Agriculture output quantity, total pollution or emission, equilibrium price, consumer and producer surplus, government budget, and social welfare are all addressed in this study. The results show that emission-reducing innovation subsidy is better than quantity subsidy because it reduces the pollution from agriculture and profits for the agricultural firm are higher under innovation subsidy than under quantity subsidy. More importantly, output quantity and consumer surplus under innovation subsidy are also larger than those under quantity subsidy if the subsidy rate is not too high. This study finds that the importance of the environment to the consumer, marginal emission, and pollution tax will decrease output quantity, consumer and producer surplus and social welfare; however, agricultural subsidy increases them. Furthermore, this study indicates that innovation subsidy can alleviate the food quantity safety and quality of environment dilemma in agriculture. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据