4.7 Article

Enhanced removal of total nitrogen and total phosphorus by applying intermittent aeration to the Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) process

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 163-171

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.017

关键词

Enhanced nutrient removal; Intermittent aeration; Intermittent Modified Ludzack-Ettinger process; Sustainable wastewater treatment

资金

  1. U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC) [W56HZV-12-C-0439]
  2. Water Resource Science and Technology Innovation Program of Guangdong Province [201628]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [201704020138]
  4. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [51608230]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [21616335]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the conventional preanoxic Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) process, the nitrified mixed liquor cannot be completely returned to the preanoxic zone for denitrification. In this study, we applied intermittent aeration to the MLE process to enhance denitrification and total phosphorus (TP) removal. Pilot-scale test results indicated that, when treating municipal wastewater with a carbon (represented by five-day biological oxygen demand) to total nitrogen (TN) ratio (e.g. C/N ratio) of 2.4 or greater, the effluent ammonia, TN, and TP were generally less than 0.5 mg-N/L, 5 mg-N/L, and 0.5 mg-P/L, respectively. The removal efficiencies of both TN and TP were approximately 90%. Under extremely low temperature of 9.3 degrees C and low C/N ratio of 1.6 conditions, this process still removed 76% of TN and 56% of TP. Compared to the conventional MLE process, the implementation of intermittent aeration significantly improved TN and TP removal and also saved aeration energy by 10%. Existing MLE plants can be easily upgraded to this intermittent aeration mode to achieve enhanced nutrient removal while saving energy. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据