4.7 Article

H2O2 Ratiometric Electrochemical Sensors Based on Nanospheres Derived from Ferrocence-Modified Covalent Organic Frameworks

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 555-562

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.9b02117

关键词

covalent-organic framework; nanospheres; ratiometric electrochemical sensor; hydrogen peroxide; ferrocence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21665012, 21765009, 21465014, 21465015]
  2. Innovation Foundation for graduate students of Jiangxi Normal University [YJS2019025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A uniform nanosphere derived from ferrocencemodified covalent-organic frameworks (COFETTA-TPAL-FC(COOH)(2)) with 200 nm in diameter was prepared by dehydration condensation reaction between 4,4',4',4'- (ethane-1,1,2,2-tetrayl) tetraaniline and terephthalaldehyde in the presence of electroactive Fc(COOH)(2). The Fc(COOH)(2) was embedded into the layers of COFETTA-TPAL to result in the formation of nanospheres, which increased the specific surface area of the available COFETTA-TPAL to provide more active sites due to the increase in interlayer distance. The Fc(COOH)(2) could interact with H2O2 which might undergo self-disproportionation process to produce O-2 and be reduced into H2O simultaneously, whereas the generated O-2 was directly reduced into H2O by COFETTA-TPAL. The reduction peak current of the generated O-2 at -0.5 V (j(-0.5 V)) was gradually enhanced, whereas that of Fc(COOH)(2) around 0.45 V (j(0.45 V)) was decreased with continuous adding of H2O2. Thus, the COFETTA-TPAL-Fc(COOH)(2) nanospheres were used to fabricate a on-off nonenzymatic H2O2 ratiometric electrochemical sensor. The proposed on-off ratiometric electrochemical sensor showed good performance with a wide linear range of 1.1-500 mu M, high sensitivity of 0.009 mu M-1, and lower detection limit of 0.33 mu M. The work would offer insights for design and preparation of electroactive COF and accelerate the practical application of COF in electroanalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据