4.7 Article

The effect of technology adoption on CO2 abatement costs under uncertainty in China's passenger car sector

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 578-592

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.004

关键词

Passenger car sector; Emission-reduction targets; CO2 abatement cost; Technology adoption; Uncertainty analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71673266, 71690245, 71210005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With increasingly severe energy and environmental issues in China, it is essential to reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions by promoting energy-saving technologies in vehicles. Combined with the 13th five-year CO2 abatement target in the passenger car sector, this study establishes the marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves of vehicle energy-saving technology bundles in China's passenger car sector during 2016-2020 under multiple uncertainties. The total cost to achieve the CO2 abatement target under uncertainties is investigated and the effect of technology adoption on reducing the CO2 abatement cost is estimated. Results show that the average MAC of the passenger car sector is relatively high (2347.21 RMB/t), with more obvious fluctuations compared to the reduction potential. Under integrated uncertainties, Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV)_path and Vehicle-technology could be preferentially promoted in the early stage of technology popularization in the passenger car sector, while Plug-in HEV_path and Hybrid-technology could be preferred in the later stage. The cumulative cost to achieve the 2020 fuel-economy target is about 33,150 million (M) RMB in the reference scenario. Compared to energy-substitution, the energy-efficiency paths or technologies have relative cost advantages and play a more important role in decreasing the CO2 abatement cost; of these, the HEV path, Diesel_path, Transmission-technology and Vehicle-technology could be preferred. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据