4.7 Article

Microstructure and residual properties of green concrete composites incorporating waste carpet fibers and palm oil fuel ash. at elevated temperatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 8-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.168

关键词

Green concrete composites; Elevated temperatures; Waste carpet fibers; Palm oil fuel ash; Microstructure; Residual properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing amount of waste generation from different processes, there has been a growing interest in the use of waste in producing sustainable building materials to achieve potential benefits. This study investigated the influence of waste polypropylene carpet fibers and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) on the microstructure and residual properties of concrete composites exposed to elevated temperatures. Four mixes containing carpet fibers (0% and 0.5%) and POFA (0% and 20%) were prepared. The specimens were exposed to high temperatures (200, 400, 600 and 800 degrees C) for 1 h. The fire resistance of the concrete specimens was then Measured in terms of mass loss as well as both residual ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) and compressive strength. The role of carpet fibers and POFA was investigated through the analysis of the microstructure in terms of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermal analysis (DTA). The results revealed that the addition of waste polypropylene carpet fibers to the concrete matrix significantly enhanced the fire resistance and residual compressive strength in addition to eliminating the explosive spalling behavior of the concrete composites at elevated temperatures. The fire resistance of the concrete mixtures was further enhanced by the inclusion of POFA. The study revealed that the utilization of waste carpet fiber and palm oil fuel ash in the production of sustainable green concrete is feasible both technically and environmentally. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据