4.7 Article

The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 41-49

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123

关键词

Legitimacy pressure; Corporate profitability; Green innovation; Green product innovation; Green process innovation; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71202055, 71372064, 71431006]
  2. Major project of National Social Sciences Fund of China [15ZDA020]
  3. Innovative Research Group National Science Foundation of China [71221061]
  4. Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of Ministry of Education of China [13jzd0016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green innovation is an important approach for achieving sustainable development. Most research on determinants of corporate green innovation has focused on either external or internal drivers. Combining institutional theory and resource-based view, the scientific value of this study lies in simultaneously exploring the influence of external legitimacy pressure and internal corporate profitability, and their interaction on green innovation. Samples of the top 100 listed companies in China, from 2008 to 2012, were used and the results demonstrated that legitimacy pressure from stakeholders has a significantly positive influence on both corporate green product innovation and process innovation. The results also revealed that corporate profitability positively affects green product innovation, while there was found to be no significant influence on green process innovation. Moreover, corporate profitability positively moderates the relationship between legitimacy pressure and green product innovation. The results show that not only the single factor of external legitimacy pressure and internal profitability, but also their interaction, affects corporate green innovation practices. This offers an integrating perspective on how corporations can be more innovative in sustainability. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据