4.6 Article

CRITICAL FACTORS OF THE APPLICATION OF NANOTECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY BY USING ANP TECHNIQUE UNDER FUZZY INTUITIONISTIC ENVIRONMENT

期刊

JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 914-925

出版社

VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2017.1343202

关键词

Intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS); Analytical network process (ANP); construction industry; nanotechnology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanotechnology plays a significant role in construction industry. The construction industry has been employed nanomaterials to improve the performance of construction components and the safety of the structure and to reduce the energy consuming and the cost of maintenance. In other words, nanotechnology has a substantial impact on the construction industry. Therefore, it is necessary to identify and evaluate the critical factors of the application of nanotechnology in construction in order to concentrate on the most critical factors. However, several techniques have been developed to prioritize the evaluation criteria. Analytical network process (ANP) technique, a branch of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, is a powerful tool to rank a limited number of criteria. This technique takes into account both tangible and intangible criteria in the process of formulation of a decision making problem. This method is capable of handling all types of independence and dependence relationships. On the other hand, intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) is a well-known technique in considering the inherent uncertainty involved in the process of modelling a decision making problem. In this paper, a new model based on the IFS and ANP technique is proposed to evaluate the critical factors of the application of nanotechnology in the construction industry. The results demonstrate that the proposed model has a high potential for taking into account the uncertainty in the form of a three dimension function, including membership, non-membership, and non-determinacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据