4.5 Article

Determination of enantiomeric vigabatrin by derivatization with diacetyl-L-tartaric anhydride followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.11.016

关键词

Vigabatrin; Enantioseparation; Diacetyl-L-tartaric anhydride; Chiral derivatization; Diastereomer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vigabatrin, one of the most widely used antiepileptic drugs, is marketed and administered as a racemic mixture, while only S-enantiomer is therapeutically effective. In the present study, diacetyl-L-tartaric acid anhydride was used as an inexpensive and effective chiral derivatization reagent to produce tartaric acid monoester derivatives of vigabatrin enantiomers that could be readily resolved by reversed phase chromatography. Derivatization conditions were statistically optimized by response surface methodology, resulting in an optimal reaction temperature of 44 degrees C and an optimal reaction time of 30 min. The derivatized diastereomers of vigabatrin and internal standard (gabapentin) were analyzed using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. For this analysis, an Agilent ZORBAX Rapid Resolution High Definition Eclipse Plus C18 column (100 mm x 2.1 mm, 1.8 mu m) was employed for chromatographic separation using 10 mM ammonium formate (pH 3.0) and methanol as mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.2 mL min(-1). The established method was validated in terms of specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, dilution integrity, recovery, matrix effect, stability, and incurred sample reanalysis. It was linear over a range of 0.25-100.0 mg L-1 for both S- and R-enantiomers (R-2 >= 0.9987 for both). Intra- and inter-day precisions and accuracies were within acceptable ranges. The method was successfully applied to determine the levels of vigabatrin enantiomers in mouse serum after administration of vigabatrin racemate. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据