4.6 Article

Thin-layer chromatography coupled with high performance liquid chromatography for determining tetrabromobisphenol A/S and their derivatives in soils

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1526, 期 -, 页码 151-156

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.10.045

关键词

Thin-layer chromatography; Tetrabromobisphenol A/S; Derivatives; Soil sample; High performance liquid chromatography

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21707148, 21407086, 21402192]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KF2016-12]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M602210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As brominated flame retardants (BFRs), tetrabromobisphenol A/S (TBBPA/S) and their derivatives have raised wide concerns owing to their widely usage, distributions and adverse effects on human health, thus monitoring these BFRs was urgently needed. In this study, a rapid and cost-effective method based on thin-layer chromatography (TLC) sample pre-treatment coupled with high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector (HPLC-DAD) (UV = 214 nm) was developed for determining TBBPA/S and their derivatives in soils, including TBBPA, TBBPA bis(allyl ether) (TBBPA-BAE),TBBPA bis(2,3-dibromopropyl ether) (TBBPA-BDBPE), TBBPS bis(allyl ether) (TBBPS-BAE) and TBBPS bis(2,3-dibromopropyl ether) (TBBPS-BDBPE). The method detection limits (MDLs) and the method quantification limits (MQLs) for these BFRs ranged from 0.023 to 0.087 mu g g(-1) dw and 0.076-0.29 mu g g(-1) dw, respectively. The recoveries were 41-108% and both RSD of repeatability and intermediate precision were less than 11%. The developed method presented good performance for analyzing natural soil samples collected from BFRs industrial park, suggesting its great application potential for monitoring environmental TBBPA/S and their derivatives. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据