4.6 Article

Error measures in quantitative structure-retention relationships studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1524, 期 -, 页码 298-302

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.09.050

关键词

QSRR modelling; External validation; Prediction error measures; Root mean squared error of prediction

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [LP120200700]
  2. Australian Commonwealth Government
  3. Australian Research Council [LP120200700] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An analysis and comparison of the use of four commonly used error measures (mean absolute error, percentage mean absolute error, root mean square error, and percentage root mean square error) for evaluating the predictive ability of quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRR) models is reported. These error measures are used for reporting errors in the prediction of retention time of external test analytes, that is, analytes not employed during model development. The error-based validation metrics were compared using a simple descriptive statistic, the sum of squared residuals (SSR) of outliers to the edge of an error window. The comparisons demonstrate that Percentage Root Mean Squared Error of Prediction (RMSEP) provides the best estimate of the predictive ability of a QSRR model, having the lowest SSR value of 20.43. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据