4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Development and validation of an ultra-performance liquid chromatography method for the determination of bis(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl)phosphate and related extractable compounds from single-use plastic films

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1492, 期 -, 页码 49-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.02.062

关键词

Extractables; Single-use films; Upstream monitoring; bDtBPP; Disposables; UPLC

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  2. European Regional Development Fund [13/SP SSPC/I2893]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [13/SP SSPC/I2893] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A UPLC-UV method is described for the detection of bDtBPP and related breakdown compounds of Irgafos 168 from single-use bioprocessing bag films using a CSH (charged surface hybrid) fluoro phenyl column and UV detection at 220 nm. The method limits of detection were between 16 mu g L-1 and 60 mu g L-1, repeatability was %RSD <= 1.8 and linearity was R-2 >= 0.9992. The method was applied to an extractables and leachables test of three single-use bioprocessing bag films. bDtBPP and oxidised Irgafos were detected from all three films in the extractables study, but not in the leachables study. A comparison of whole bag and small scale film extractions demonstrated that the small scale extractions were more suitable for finding concentration per area of film and/or estimating total load of extractables in the entire bag. The feasibility of upstream monitoring of extractable and leachable compounds with the Waters PATROL UPLC System via a Flownamics((R)) sampling probe was also tested with cell growth medium spiked with bDtBPP. bDtBPP was only detected in at-line injections or online injections when the probe membrane was removed indicating that with the current sampling interface, monitoring of extractables and/or leachables is limited to at-line sampling. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据