4.6 Article

Glyoxal and methylglyoxal as urinary markers of diabetes. Determination using a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction procedure combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1509, 期 -, 页码 43-49

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.06.041

关键词

Glyoxal and methylglyoxal; Human urine; Diabetes; Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; 2,3-Diaminonaphthalene

资金

  1. Comunidad Autonoma de la Region de Murcia (CARM, Fundacion Seneca) [19888/GERM/15]
  2. Spanish MINECO [CTQ2015-68049-R]
  3. European Commission (FEDER/ERDF)
  4. Fundacion Seneca, CARM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glyoxal (GO) and methylglyoxal (MGO) are ce-oxoaldehydes that can be used as urinary diabetes markers. In this study, their levels were measured using a sample preparation procedure based on salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction (SALLE) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The effect of the derivatization reaction with 2,3-diaminonaphthalene, the addition of acetonitrile and sodium chloride to urine, and the DLLME step using the acetonitrile extract as dispersant solvent and carbon tetrachloride as extractant solvent were carefully optimized. Quantification was performed by the internal standard method, using 5-bromo-2-chloroanisole. The intraday and interday precisions were lower than 6%. Limits of detection were 0.12 and 0.06 ng mL(-1), and enrichment factors 140 and 130 for GO and MGO, respectively. The concentrations of these ot-oxoaldehydes in urine were between 0.9 and 35.8 ng g(-1) levels (creatinine adjusted). A statistical comparison of the analyte contents of urine samples from non-diabetic and diabetic patients pointed to significant differences (P = 0.046, 24 subjects investigated), particularly regarding MGO, which was higher in diabetic patients. The novelty of this study compared with previous procedures lies in the treatment of the urine sample by SALLE based on the addition of acetonitrile and sodium chloride to the urine. The DLLME procedure is performed with a sedimented drop of the extractant solvent, without a surfactant reagent, and using acetonitrile as dispersant solvent. Separation of the analytes was performed using GC-MS detection, being the analytes unequivocal identified. The proposed procedure is the first microextraction method applied to the analysis of urine samples from diabetic and non-diabetic patients that allows a clear differentiation between both groups using a simple analysis. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据