4.6 Article

A rapid dual-channel readout approach for sensing carbendazim with 4-aminobenzenethiol-functionalized core-shell Au@Ag nanoparticles

期刊

ANALYST
卷 145, 期 5, 页码 1801-1809

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9an02185j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1603400]
  2. Contemporary International Collaborative Research Centre of Guangdong Province on Food Innovative Processing and Intelligent Control [2019A050519001]
  3. Common Technical Innovation Team of Guangdong Province on Preservation and Logistics of Agricultural Products [2019KJ145, 2019KJ101]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018MS056, 2017MS075]
  5. Innovation Centre of Guangdong Province for Modern Agricultural Science and Technology on Intelligent Sensing and Precision Control of Agricultural Product Qualities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a 4-aminobenzenethiol-functionalized core-shell silver-coated gold nanoparticle (Au@Ag-4ABT NP) system was designed for the rapid sensing of carbendazim (CBZ) using a combination of naked-eye colorimetry and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) dual-channel approach. Under alkaline conditions, the deprotonated CBZ species could interact with Ag surfaces via the N-Ag-O and N-Ag-N bonds. As a result, the neighboring Au@Ag-4ABT NPs would come closer through pi-pi interactions inducing the aggregation of Au@Ag-4ABT NPs. The aggregation of nanoparticles caused changes in the optical properties of the colloidal system, allowing observation with naked eyes, while the generation of more localized surface plasmon resonance hotspots between the adjacent Au@Ag nanoparticles permitted monitoring by the SERS technique. The proposed method showed effective sensitivity toward CBZ with limit of detection and limit of quantitation values of 37 and 122 ppb, respectively. In addition, the proposed dual-channel assay could serve as a simple and rapid method for sensing CBZ in tap water, cauliflower, and pear juice within 30 min.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据