4.5 Article

Surface hydrophobicity and acidity effect on alumina catalyst in catalytic methanol dehydration reaction

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5371

关键词

DME; methanol dehydration; mesoporous alumina; boehmite; Cu/Al2O3

资金

  1. NPRP from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation)
  2. DEL/NI
  3. South Valley University in Egypt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Methanol to dimethyl ether (MTD) is considered one of the main routes for the production of clean bio-fuel. The effect of copper loading on the catalytic performance of different phases of alumina that formed by calcination at two different temperatures was examined for the dehydration of methanol to dimethyl ether (DME). RESULTS: A range of Cu loadings of (1, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 15% Cu wt/wt) on Al2O3 calcined at 350 and 550 degrees C were prepared and characterized by TGA, XRD, BET, NH3-TPD, TEM, H-2-TPR, SEM, EDX, XPS and DRIFT-Pyridine techniques. The prepared catalysts were used in a fixed bed reactor under reaction conditions in which the temperature ranged from 180-300 degrees C with weight hourly space velocity (WHSV)=12.1h(-1). It was observed that all catalysts calcined at 550 degrees C (gamma-Al2O3 support phase) exhibited higher activity than those calcined at 350 degrees C (gamma-AlOOH), and this is due to the phase support change. Furthermore, the optimum Cu loading was found to be 6% Cu/gamma-Al2O3 with this catalyst also showing a high degree of stability under steady state conditions and this is attributed to the enhancement in surface acidity and hydrophobicity. CONCLUSION: The addition of copper to the support improved the catalyst properties and activity. For all the copper modified catalysts, the optimum catalyst with high degree of activity and stability was 6% copper loaded on gamma alumina. (c) 2017 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据