4.7 Article

Stereodirectional images of molecules oriented by a variable-voltage hexapolar field: Fragmentation channels of 2-bromobutane electronically excited at two photolysis wavelengths

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 147, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4981025

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [NSC 102-2113-M-002-009-MY3]
  2. Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research, MIUR through SIR [RBSI14U3VF]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17KT0008] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The asymmetric-top molecule 2-bromobutane is oriented by means of a hexapole state selector; the angular distribution of the bromine atom photofragment, for the two fine-structure components, is acquired by velocity-map ion imaging. The molecular beam, spatially oriented along the time-of-flight axis, is intersected with a linearly polarized laser, whose polarization is tilted by 45 degrees with respect to the detector surface. To obtain the mixing ratio of the perpendicular and parallel transitions, the fragment ion images and angular distributions can be appropriately simulated to give insight on the population mechanism of the specific electronic state involved at each selected excitation wavelength. The photofragment images obtained at 238.6 nm yielded an asymmetry factor beta(1) of 0.67, indicative of the extent of molecular orientation, and an anisotropy parameter beta(2) of 1.03, which is a signature of a prevailing parallel transition along the C-Br axis. When the photolysis wavelength is tuned to 254.1 nm, the corresponding angular distribution is less asymmetric (beta(1) = 0.24) and the obtained small value beta(2) = 0.12 is a characteristic of a predominantly perpendicular transition. The photofragment angular distributions are also affected by hexapole voltage, especially regarding the asymmetry factor, and this aspect provides information on the effect of molecular orientation. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据