4.7 Article

Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 146, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4974989

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry Program [DE-FG02-09ER16053]
  2. Big-Data Private-Cloud Research Cyberinfrastructure MRI-award - NSF [CNS-1338099]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  4. FEDER [FIS2015-63770-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coupled cluster and symmetry projected Hartree-Fock are two central paradigms in electronic structure theory. However, they are very different. Single reference coupled cluster is highly successful for treating weakly correlated systems but fails under strong correlation unless one sacrifices good quantum numbers and works with broken-symmetry wave functions, which is unphysical for finite systems. Symmetry projection is effective for the treatment of strong correlation at the mean-field level through multireference non-orthogonal configuration interaction wavefunctions, but unlike coupled cluster, it is neither size extensive nor ideal for treating dynamic correlation. We here examine different scenarios for merging these two dissimilar theories. We carry out this exercise over the integrable Lipkin model Hamiltonian, which despite its simplicity, encompasses non-trivial physics for degenerate systems and can be solved via diagonalization for a very large number of particles. We show how symmetry projection and coupled cluster doubles individually fail in different correlation limits, whereas models that merge these two theories are highly successful over the entire phase diagram. Despite the simplicity of the Lipkin Hamiltonian, the lessons learned in this work will be useful for building an ab initio symmetry projected coupled cluster theory that we expect to be accurate in the weakly and strongly correlated limits, as well as the recoupling regime. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据