4.7 Article

Landscape-level persistence and distribution of alien feral crops linked to seed transport

期刊

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 119-126

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.024

关键词

Anthropogenic dispersal; Exotic; Feral crops; Propagule pressure; Roadside vegetation; Survival analysis; Weed

资金

  1. Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (NZ)
  2. Bio-Protection Research Centre
  3. New Zealand Plant Protection Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess the biotic and abiotic drivers of feral crop persistence, the occurrence and size of alien Brassica populations across an agricultural landscape in Canterbury, New Zealand, were surveyed over three years. Measures related to propagule input and site conditions were recorded and their role in explaining population occurrence and persistence assessed through GLMs and proportional-hazard models. Many Brassica populations were transient, with about 60% of populations disappearing within two years. New populations were founded at a rate that compensated for those that disappeared, and were more likely to occur along transportation routes and near seed companies, suggesting they established from seed spillage. Larger populations and those growing where habitat conditions were similar to those in which Brassica are cultivated had higher probabilities of survival. Without anthropogenic seed input to found new populations, Brassica spp. are unlikely to persist in this landscape beyond ten years. To avoid overestimating the extent of naturalised populations over time it is important to account for local population extinctions. The abundance of feral crops that occur as casuals in the landscape, along with other aliens that are maintained by external seed inputs, could be controlled by managing propagule sources. In themselves, casual populations are unlikely to facilitate gene flow or act as sources of further population spread. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据