4.2 Article

The Establishment of Experimental Method to Observe Bubble Formation in High Temperature Molten Salt System and Estimation of Generated Bubble Size

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 86-93

出版社

SOC CHEMICAL ENG JAPAN
DOI: 10.1252/jcej.15we307

关键词

Bubble Formation; Bubble Size; Molten Salt; Sodium Nitrate; High-Temperature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, molten salt has attracted attention as an attractive liquid phase for gas-liquid processes at high temperature. Then a method of estimating the gas-liquid interfacial area in molten salt is required. However, the experimental and theoretical methods to estimate the gas bubble size in molten salt systems have not yet established. Especially, there is a lack of experimental techniques to directly observe the bubble formation in a high temperature system. The experimental observation of growth, stretch and detachment of bubbles is also necessary for modeling and numerical simulation. Thus, at first, this study tried to construct a reliable experimental method for observing the bubble formation in a hightemperature liquid. Clear images of the progress of bubble formation could be recorded by the experimental setups proposed in this study. The bubble formed in sodium nitrate was clear, spherically shaped and the shape was maintained longer than in aqueous system. Secondly, using this images, the bubble size generated in molten sodium nitrate was measured. The measured value was compared with the estimated values of the empirical formula established in the aqueous system. At dynamic conditions, where the difference of the physical properties has no effect on the bubble size, the same equation was applicable to those two quite different solutions. However, at static conditions, the measured bubble size was larger than the estimated value. It suggested that the empirical formula established for the aqueous system could not sufficiently estimate the effect of the surface tension in a molten salt solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据