4.6 Article

PET imaging of cannabinoid type 2 receptors with [11C]A-836339 did not evidence changes following neuroinflammation in rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 1163-1178

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X16685105

关键词

[C-11]A-836339; cannabinoid type 2 receptors; cerebral ischemia; [F-18]DPA-714; neuroinflammation; positron emission tomography; TSPO

资金

  1. Department of Industry of the Basque Government and Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [SAF2014-54070- JIN]
  2. EU 7th Framework Programme (FP7) [ndegrees278850]
  3. France Life Imaging [ANR-11-INBS0006 (FLI)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cannabinoid type 2 receptors (CB2R) have emerged as promising targets for the diagnosis and therapy of brain pathologies. However, no suitable radiotracers for accurate CB2R mapping have been found to date, limiting the investigation of the CB2 receptor expression using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. In this work, we report the evaluation of the invivo expression of CB2R with [C-11]A-836339 PET after cerebral ischemia and in two rat models of neuroinflammation, first by intrastriatal LPS and then by AMPA injection. PET images and invitro autoradiography showed a lack of specific [C-11]A-836339 uptake in these animal models demonstrating the limitation of this radiotracer to image CB2 receptor under neuroinflammatory conditions. Further, using immunohistochemistry, the CB2 receptor displayed a modest expression increase after cerebral ischemia, LPS and AMPA models. Finally, [F-18]DPA-714-PET and immunohistochemistry demonstrated decreased neuroinflammation by a selective CB2R agonist, JWH133. Taken together, these findings suggest that [C-11]A-836339 is not a suitable radiotracer to monitor invivo CB2R expression by using PET imaging. Future studies will have to investigate alternative radiotracers that could provide an accurate binding to CB2 receptors following brain inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据