4.6 Article

The effects of hypercapnia on cortical capillary transit time heterogeneity (CTH) in anesthetized mice

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X17692598

关键词

Capillary transit-time heterogeneity; hypercapnia; capillaries; transit-time heterogeneity; two-photon microscopy; red blood cell velocity

资金

  1. Danish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Education (MINDLab)
  2. Danish National Research Foundation (CFIN)
  3. VELUX Foundation (ARCADIA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capillary flow patterns are highly heterogeneous in the resting brain. During hyperemia, capillary transit-time heterogeneity (CTH) decreases, in proportion to blood's mean transit time (MTT) in passive, compliant microvascular networks. Previously, we found that functional activation reduces the CTH:MTT ratio, suggesting that additional homogenization takes place through active neurocapillary coupling mechanisms. Here, we examine changes in the CTH:MTT ratio during hypercapnic hyperemia in anesthetized mice (C57Bl/6NTac), expecting that homogenization is smaller than during functional hyperemia. We used an indicator-dilution technique and multiple capillary scans by two-photon microscopy to estimate CTH and MTT. During hypercapnia, MTT and CTH decreased as derived from indicator-dilution between artery and vein, as well as between arterioles and venules. The CTH:MTT ratio, however, increased. The same tendency was observed in the estimates from capillary scans. The parallel reductions of MTT and CTH are consistent with previous data. We speculate that the relative increase in CTH compared to MTT during hypercapnia represents either or both capillary constrictions and blood passage through functional thoroughfare channels. Intriguingly, hemodynamic responses to hypercapnia declined with cortical depth, opposite previous reports of hemodynamic responses to functional activation. Our findings support the role of CTH in cerebral flow-metabolism coupling during hyperemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据