4.7 Article

Lipid composition of membrane microdomains isolated detergent-free from PUFA supplemented RAW264.7 macrophages

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 233, 期 3, 页码 2602-2612

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26138

关键词

lipid rafts; macrophages/monocytes; mass spectrometry; phospholipids; polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA); RRID: CVCL_0493

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SCHU 2586/1-2, SCHU 2586/2-1]
  2. SalWe Research Program of Intelligent Monitoring of Health and Wellbeing (IMO) [648/10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Profound alterations in the lipid profile of raft and non-raft plasma membrane microdomains were found when RAW264.7 macrophages were supplemented with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in physiologically relevant concentrations. For the first time lipids in the detergent-free isolated membrane domains of phagocytic immune cells were characterized by mass spectrometry. The extent of remodeling of the membrane lipids differed with different n3 and n6 PUFA supplements. The mildest effects were detected for alpha-linolenic acid (LNA) and linoleic acid (LA), the C18 precursors of the n3 and n6 families, respectively. When the effects of highly unsaturated PUFAs were compared, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) caused more extensive restructuring of membrane lipids than docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or arachidonic acid (AA). The supplements altered the lipid species composition of both the raft and non-raft membrane fractions. The rafts containing elevated proportions of highly unsaturated lipid species may relocate sterically incompatible lipids and proteins originally belonging to this microdomain. Such effect was evident for sphingomyelin, which favored non-rafts instead of rafts after EPA supplementation. The current work suggests that the different functional consequences found previously when supplementing macrophages with either EPA or DHA have their origin in the different effects of these PUFAs on membrane architecture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据