4.7 Article

Bone loss in C57BL/6J-OlaHsd mice, a substrain of C57BL/6J carrying mutated alpha-synuclein and multimerin-1 genes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 233, 期 1, 页码 371-377

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.25895

关键词

bone mass accrual; C57Bl/6J substrains; genetic drift; osteoporosis; peak bone mass

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [1367/12, 1822/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inbred mouse strain C57BL/6 is commonly used for the generation of transgenic mouse and is a well established strain in bone research. Different vendors supply different substrains of C57BL/6J as wild-type animals when genetic drift did not incur any noticeable phenotype. However, we sporadically observed drastic differences in the bone phenotype of WT C57BL/6J mice originating from different labs and speculated that these variations are attributable, at least in part, to the variation between C57BL/6J substrains, which is often overlooked. C57BL/6J-OlaHsd is a commonly used substrain that despite a well defined deletion in the alpha-synuclein (Snca) and multimerin-1 (Mmrn1) genes, was reported to display no obvious phenotype and is used as WT control. Here, we compared the bone phenotype of C57BL/6J-OlaHsd (6J-OLA) to C57BL/6J-RccHsd (6J-RCC) and to the original C57BL/6J (6J-JAX). Using CT analysis, we found that 6J-OLA mice display a significantly lower trabecular bone mass compared to 6J-RCC and 6J-JAX. PCR analysis revealed that both the Snca and Mmrn1 genes are expressed in bone tissue of 6J-RCC animals but not of 6J-OLA mutants, suggesting either one or both genes play a role in bone metabolism. In vitro analysis demonstrated increase in osteoclasts number and decreased osteoblast mineralization in cells derived from 6J-OLA compared with 6J-RCC. Our data may shed light on unexplained differences in basal bone measurements between different research centers and reiterate the importance of specifying the exact substrain type. In addition, our findings describe the physiological role for Mmrn1 and/or Snca in bone remodeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据