4.6 Article

First-principles modeling of binary layered topological insulators: Structural optimization and exchange-correlation functionals

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 101, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.085140

关键词

-

资金

  1. VILLUM FONDEN via the Centre of Excellence for Dirac Materials [11744]
  2. European Research Council under the European Unions Seventh Framework Program Synergy HERO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topological insulators (TIs) are materials that are insulating in the bulk but have zero band-gap surface states with linear dispersion and are protected by time-reversal symmetry. These unique characteristics could pave the way for many promising applications that include spintronic devices and quantum computations. It is important to understand and theoretically describe TIs as accurately as possible to predict properties. Quantum mechanical approaches, specifically first-principles density-functional-theory (DFT)-based methods, have been used extensively to model electronic properties of TIs. Here we provide a comprehensive assessment of a variety of DFT formalisms and how these capture the electronic structure of TIs. We concentrate on Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3 as examples of prototypical TI materials. We find that the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and kinetic density functional (metaGGA) increase the thickness of the TI slab, whereas we see the opposite behavior in DFT computations using LDA. Accounting for van der Waals (vdW) interactions overcomes the apparent over-relaxations and retraces the atomic positions toward the bulk. Based on a systematic computational study, we show that GGA with vdW treatment is an appropriate method for structural optimization. However, the vdW corrections recover the experimental bulk parameters, and do not influence the charge density implicitly. Thus, electronic structures derived from the base GGA functional, employing experimental lattice parameters, is sufficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据