4.7 Article

Preparation of hyperbranched polymers by oxa-Michael addition polymerization

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 1298-1306

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9py01686d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51903020, 21504009, 21474010]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190932]
  3. Changzhou Sci Tech Program [CJ20190058]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, we developed an efficient approach to prepare hyperbranched polymers at room temperature via phosphazene-base t-BuP2 catalyzed oxa-Michael addition polymerization from commercially available trifunctional hydroxyl and diacrylate monomers. The branching structure of the obtained polymers and the polymerization process were investigated by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and triple-detection size-exclusion chromatography (TD-SEC) analysis. It was revealed that acrylic double bond terminated branched polymers with high molecular weights and high degrees of branching (M-w.MALLS > 2.8 x 10(5) g mol(-1), DB >= 0.8) were produced by t-BuP2 catalyzed oxa-Michael addition polymerization of a trimethylolpropane (TMP) with a double molar 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA) in DMF at room temperature, even at 0 degrees C. The study of the branching process showed that t-BuP2 catalyzed oxa-Michael addition branching polymerization is rapid, and that significant branched structures formed when the polymerization was performed at 3 min. Most importantly, the prepared branched polymers can be further post-functionalized via aza- or thio-Michael addition reactions, due to the polymers retaining the acrylic double bond functionality. This research provides a versatile and efficient method for the preparation of hyperbranched polymers from commercially available monomers, and it is feasible to prepare functional branched polymers for application in various fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据