4.5 Article

MiR-9 is involved in TGF-1-induced lung cancer cell invasion and adhesion by targeting SOX7

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 2000-2008

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13120

关键词

microRNA-9; SOX7; transforming growth factor-beta 1; lung cancer; invasion; adhesion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNA (miR)-9 plays different roles in different cancer types. Here, we investigated the role of miR-9 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell invasion and adhesion in vitro and explored whether miR-9 was involved in transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-1)-induced NSCLC cell invasion and adhesion by targeting SOX7. The expression of miR-9 and SOX7 in human NSCLC tissues and cell lines was examined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments were performed on A549 and HCC827 cells to investigate the effect of miR-9 and SOX7 on NSCLC cell invasion and adhesion in the presence or absence of TGF-1. Transwell-Matrigel assay and cell adhesion assay were used to examine cell invasion and adhesion abilities. Luciferase reporter assay was performed to determine whether SOX7 was a direct target of miR-9. We found miR-9 was up-regulated and SOX7 was down-regulated in human NSCLC tissues and cell lines. Moreover, SOX7 expression was negatively correlated with miR-9 expression. miR-9 knockdown or SOX7 overexpression could suppress TGF-1-induced NSCLC cell invasion and adhesion. miR-9 directly targets the 3 untranslated region of SOX7, and SOX7 protein expression was down-regulated by miR-9. TGF-1 induced miR-9 expression in NSCLC cells. miR-9 up-regulation led to enhanced NSCLC cell invasion and adhesion; however, these effects could be attenuated by SOX7 overexpression. We concluded that miR-9 expression was negatively correlated with SOX7 expression in human NSCLC. miR-9 was up-regulated by TGF-1 and contributed to TGF-1-induced NSCLC cell invasion and adhesion by directly targeting SOX7.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据