4.0 Article

Mirabegron improves sleep measures, nocturia, and lower urinary tract symptoms in those with urinary symptoms associated with disordered sleep

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 10106-10117

出版社

CANADIAN J UROLOGY

关键词

mirabegron; disordered sleep; nocturia; lower urinary tract symptoms

资金

  1. Astellas Scientific and Medical Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The role of organized sleep in overall health and quality-of-life (QoL) is critical. Nocturia necessarily disrupts the normal sleep cycle and negatively impacts one's health, work productivity, and QoL. We investigated, for the first time in an exploratory pilot, the effectiveness of mirabegron for improving sleep disturbance and nocturia. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, open-label 12-week trial evaluating the efficacy of mirabegron in 34 men and women with disordered sleep and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Subjects received mirabegron 25 mg daily for 4 weeks, then increased to 50 mg. Subjects completed the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form (PROMIS-SDSF), Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), voiding diaries, and QoL questionnaires. Results: PROMIS-SDSF scores decreased from 26.5 points to 19.3, representing a categorical improvement from clinically mild to none to slight sleep disturbance (p < 0.001). JSS scores also decreased from 14.1 to 8.3 (p < 0.001). IPSS decreased from 21.0 to 12.4, denoting a categorical improvement from severe to moderate LUTS (p < 0.001). Voiding diaries revealed 1.9fewer voids per day (p < 0.01) and 0.8 fewer nighttime voids (p < 0.05). QoL improved from 0% in subjects who selected mostly satisfied, pleased, or delighted to 29.6% at follow up. Conclusions: Mirabegron use improves nocturia and produces rapid, durable, and clinically significant improvement in sleep disturbance and LUTS in males and females with urinary symptoms associated with disordered sleep.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据