4.7 Article

The VDAC2-BAK axis regulates peroxisomal membrane permeability

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 216, 期 3, 页码 709-721

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201605002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology grant from the Science and Technology Agency of Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  3. Kyushu University Interdisciplinary Programs in Education and Projects in Research Development
  4. Takeda Science Foundation
  5. Naito Foundation
  6. Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology
  7. National Institutes of Health grant [R01CA125562]
  8. [20370039]
  9. [23570236]
  10. [24247038]
  11. [25112518]
  12. [25116717]
  13. [26116007]
  14. [15K14511]
  15. [15K21743]
  16. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26116007, 26440032, 15K14511] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisomal biogenesis disorders (PBDs) are fatal genetic diseases consisting of 14 complementation groups (CGs). We previously isolated a peroxisome-deficient Chinese hamster ovary cell mutant, ZP114, which belongs to none of these CGs. Using a functional screening strategy, VDAC2 was identified as rescuing the peroxisomal deficiency of ZP114 where VDAC2 expression was not detected. Interestingly, knockdown of BAK or overexpression of the BAK inhibitors BCL-X-L and MCL-1 restored peroxisomal biogenesis in ZP114 cells. Although VDAC2 is not localized to the peroxisome, loss of VDAC2 shifts the localization of BAK from mitochondria to peroxisomes, resulting in peroxisomal deficiency. Introduction of peroxisome-targeted BAK harboring the Pex26p transmembrane region into wild-type cells resulted in the release of peroxisomal matrix proteins to cytosol. Moreover, overexpression of BAK activators PUMA and BIM permeabilized peroxisomes in a BAK-dependent manner. Collectively, these findings suggest that BAK plays a role in peroxisomal permeability, similar to mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据