4.3 Article

Cataract surgery and environmental sustainability: Waste and lifecycle assessment of phacoemulsification at a private healthcare facility

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
卷 43, 期 11, 页码 1391-1398

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fulbright-Nehru Academic and Professional Excellence Award through the United States India Educational Foundation, New Delhi, India
  2. Career Development Grant from the U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA [K23 EY025014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To measure the waste generation and lifecycle environmental emissions from cataract surgery via phacoemulsification in a recognized resource-efficient setting. Setting: Two tertiary care centers of the Aravind Eye Care System in southern India. Design: Observational case series. Methods: Manual waste audits, purchasing data, and interviews with Aravind staff were used in a hybrid environmental lifecycle assessment framework to quantify the environmental emissions associated with cataract surgery. Kilograms of solid waste generated and midpoint emissions in a variety of impact categories (eg, kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents). Results: Aravind generates 250 grams of waste per phacoemulsification and nearly 6 kilograms of carbon dioxide-equivalents in greenhouse gases. This is approximately 5% of the United Kingdom's phaco carbon footprint with comparable outcomes. A majority of Aravind's lifecycle environmental emissions occur in the sterilization process of reusable instruments because their surgical system uses largely reusable instruments and materials. Electricity use in the operating room and the Central Sterile Services Department (CSSD) accounts for 10% to 25% of most environmental emissions. Conclusions: Surgical systems in most developed countries and, in particular their use of materials, are unsustainable. Results show that ophthalmologists and other medical specialists can reduce material use and emissions in medical procedures using the system described here. (C) 2017 ASCRS and ESCRS

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据