4.3 Article

Axial length measurements: Comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer and partial coherence interferometry in myopia

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 328-332

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.023

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To compare axial length (AL) measurements between a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer (10LMaster 700) and a partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer (10LMaster, version 5.4) in myopic eyes. Setting: Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. Design: Prospective evaluation of a diagnostic test. Methods: This study enrolled patients with a diagnosis of myopia in their medical records. Two consecutive AL measurements were performed in each eye in random order using the 2 biometers. Sub analysis was performed according to lens status, fixation status, degree of myopia, and the presence of posterior staphyloma. The interdevice agreement was evaluated with Bland-Altman analyses and paired t tests. Results: This study comprised 219 eyes of 117 patients. During a fixation check using SS-OCT, 19.6% of eyes showed fixation loss. Overall, the SS-OCT biometer showed a longer AL than the PCI biometer. (P <.001) In a subanalysis that categorized eyes according to lens status, fixation status, degree of myopia, and the presence of posterior staphyloma, the SS-OCT biometer also showed longer ALs than the PCI biometer. Of eyes with good fixation, significant differences in AL measurements between devices were detected for those with posterior staphyloma (P <.001) but not for those without posterior staphyloma (P =.104). Conclusions: The 2 devices showed differences in AL measurements in myopic eyes. Fixation status and the presence of posterior staphyloma were important factors in these differences. For myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma, the SS-OCT biometer is expected to produce more precise AL measurements because it allows evaluation of the fixation status. (C) 2017 ASCRS and ESCRS

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据