4.7 Article

Static and dynamic properties of multi-ionic plasma mixtures

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 101, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.033207

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science Campaign 4
  2. Science Campaign 1
  3. Advanced Technology Computing Campaign (ATCC) by the U.S. Department of Energy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory
  4. National Nuclear Security Administration of US Department of Energy [89233218NCA000001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complex plasma mixtures with three or more components are often encountered in astrophysics or in inertial confinement fusion (ICF) experiments. For mixtures containing species with large differences in atomic number Z, the modeling needs to consider at the same time the kinetic theory for low-Z elements combined with the theory of strongly coupled plasma for high-Z elements, as well as all the intermediate situations that can appear in multicomponent systems. For such cases, we study the pair distribution functions, self-diffusions, mutual diffusion, and viscosity for ternary mixtures at extreme conditions. These quantities can be produced from first principles using orbital free molecular dynamics at the computational expense of very intensive simulations to reach good statistics. Utilizing the first-principles results as reference data, we assess the merit of a global analytic model for transport coefficients, pseudo-ions in jellium (PIJ), based on an isoelectronic assumption (iso-ne). With a multicomponent hypernetted-chain integral equation, we verify the quality of the iso-ne prescription for describing the static structure of the mixtures. This semianalytical modeling compares well with the simulation results and allows one to consider plasma mixtures not accessible to simulations. Applications are given for the mix of materials in ICF experiments. A reduction of a multicomponent mixture to an effective binary mixture is also established in the hydrodynamic limit and compared with PIJ estimations for ICF relevant mixtures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据